Rebecca M. Stumpf

Social Psychology · 2005–2006

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Rebecca M. Stumpf trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. T. Deschner
  2. Christophe Boesch
  3. M. Heistermann
  4. J. Lehmann
  5. M. Andersson
  6. K. Hodges
  7. R. Wrangham
  8. Daniel J. Povinelli
  9. C. Schaik
  10. Ian Penton-Voak

Who trusts Rebecca M. Stumpf overall

  1. Martin N. Muller
  2. M. Emery Thompson
  3. John C. Mitani
  4. J. Lehmann
  5. Christophe Boesch
  6. T. Deschner
  7. Sonya M. Kahlenberg
  8. R. Wrangham

Papers from Rebecca M. Stumpf's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Rebecca M. Stumpf trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Does promiscuous mating preclude female choice? Female sexual strategies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)
  2. Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus
  3. Sexual selection and mate choice. (Trends in Ecology & Evolution)
  4. To fission or to fusion: effects of community size on wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) social organisation (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)
  5. The interaction of male and female reproductive strategies and paternity in wild Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata
  6. Social influences on ranging patterns among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire
  7. Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos: The cost of sexual attraction: is there a trade-off in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion?
  8. Sexual Selection in Primates: Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality
  9. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence
  10. Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice

Their papers