Sexual Selection in Primates: Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality

By C. Schaik, Gauri Pradhan, M. A. Noordwijk. 2004

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85d7ce3eed2275e65355e30714e69235642ede6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real (2011, background): “Multi-male mating appears to benefit females 66 primarily by confusing paternity, and thus reducing the risk of male infanticide (Hrdy 67 1979, van Noordwijk & van Schaik 2000, Paul 2002, van Schaik et al. 2004).”
The efficacy of female choice in chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire (2006, background): “Females of many species have well-developed behavioral and physiological sexual strategies to counter the sexual strategies of males and facilitate mate choice (Hrdy 1979; Janson 1984; Manson 1992; van Schaik et al. 2000, 2004; Stumpf and Boesch 2005; Setchell and Kappeleler 2003, for review).”
Do Female Mandrills Prefer Brightly Colored Males? (2005, background): “…sample sizes, as well as the complex interactions between male and female reproductive strategies (Setchell and Kappeler, 2003; Soltis et al., 2001; van Schaik et al., 2004), that make it extremely difficult to separate the effects of male and female strategies on mating and reproductive success.”
Mate guarding and paternity in mandrills: factors influencing alpha male monopoly (2005, background): “…of conception, female reproductive strategies including mate choice (Bercovitch 1991; Alberts et al. 2003) and strategies to increase the number of males with which females mate (Hrdy 1979; van Schaik et al. 2004), and interactions between male and female strategies (e.g. Soltis et al. 2001).”