Social influences on ranging patterns among chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire
By J. Lehmann, Christophe Boesch. 2003
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bb6e276dc24bc4af72b79beaa57ab1882554fea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- R. Wrangham
- John C. Mitani
- Martin N. Muller
- M. Wilson
- Christophe Boesch
- J. Lehmann
- Amanda H. Korstjens
- Jessica Ganas
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- R. Wrangham
- Martin N. Muller
- John C. Mitani
- Christophe Boesch
- M. Wilson
- J. Lehmann
- Amanda H. Korstjens
- M. Robbins
In Social Psychology
- R. Wrangham
- John C. Mitani
- Martin N. Muller
- Christophe Boesch
- M. Wilson
- J. Lehmann
- Amanda H. Korstjens
- M. Robbins
Citations in the corpus
- Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees (2005, background): “Territory sizes average between 5 –30 km2 depending on habitat type and quality (Chapman and Wrangham, 1993; Hasegawa, 1990; Herbinger et al., 2001; Lehmann and Boesch, 2003; Newton‐Fisher, 2003; Williams et al., 2002b).”
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk (2007, unknown): “…means of identifying the extent of the range, and is widely used in other studies for this purpose (e.g., wolves, Mech, 1994; spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta), Boydston et al., 2003; chimpanzees, Chapman & Wrangham, 1993; Herbinger et al., 2001; Lehmann & Boesch, 2003; Williams et al., 2004).”
- To fission or to fusion: effects of community size on wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) social organisation (2004, methodology): “Relative measures, such as strength differences between communities, may provide better measures, but were unavailable in our study (Williams et al. 2002; Lehmann and Boesch 2003).”
- Vocal, gestural and locomotor responses of wild chimpanzees to familiar and unfamiliar intruders: A playback study (2009, unknown): “…the communities increased during the period of this playback study but the process was already ongoing before the experiments, suggesting that it was the product of other variables, particularly the number of adult males and their relative fighting power (Lehmann & Boesch 2003; Boesch et al. 2008).”
- Ranging behavior of the mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a test of the ecological constraints model (2005, methodology): “…between group size and home range size (Supriatna et al. 1986; Butynski 1990; Ostro et al. 1999; Gillespie and Chapman 2001; Steenbeck and van Schaik 2001; Dias and Strier 2003) while others have not (Struhsaker and Leland 1987; Yeager and Kool 2000; Fashing 2001; Lehmann and Boesch 2003).”
- Core area quality is associated with variance in reproductive success among female chimpanzees at Kibale National Park (2007, unknown): “…in the Ta€ ı community in Cote d'Ivoire (Pan troglodytes verus) show increased gregariousness and wider ranging habits than do Kanyawara chimpanzees (Lehmann & Boesch 2003, 2005); they also show more clearly defined rank relationships in the context of feeding competition (Boesch 1997; Wittig &…”
- Fission–fusion social systems as a strategy for coping with ecological constraints: a primate case (2007, background): “a Boesch and Boesch-Achermann (2000), Doran (1997) and Lehmann and Boesch (2003, 2004) c Boesch and Boesch-Achermann (2000) and White (1992, 1996) eJones and Sabater Pi (1971) f Tutin and Fernandez (1993) and Tutin et al. (1997) gSakura (1994), Sugiyama and Koman (1987), Takemoto (2004) and Yamako”
- Sociality of the dispersing sex: The nature of social bonds in West African female chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes (2009, unknown): “Although home range size varied over the study period, it did not change as much as group size, so that the smaller group lived in a relatively larger home range (Lehmann & Boesch 2003).”
- The efficacy of female choice in chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire (2006, background): “In addition, Taï females spend less time alone and more time in both all-female and mixed parties than females at other sites do (Boesch and Boesch-Achermann 2000; Lehmann and Boesch 2003).”
- Grouping Patterns and Competition Among Female Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda (2008, unknown): “…at Taï, the rate of female food conflicts alone was 0.1/h (Wittig and Boesch 2003), 10-fold the rate of food conflicts at Ngogo, but the density of females at the time was only ca. 0.6 females/km2 (10.5 adult females and community home range size in 1996 ∼17.1 km2: Lehmann and Boesch 2003).”
- INTERGROUP RELATIONS IN CHIMPANZEES (2003, background): “At Taı̈, the Northern group’s territory was larger when it contained more males (Lehmann & Boesch 2003).”