Stephen Maw

Education · 2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stephen Maw trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. M. Price
  2. C. Rust
  3. D. Carless
  4. David J. Nicol

Papers from Stephen Maw's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen Maw trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  2. Differing perceptions in the feedback process
  3. Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
  4. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
  5. The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning
  6. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education
  7. Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write?
  8. The quality of guidance and feedback to students
  9. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  10. Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect?

Their papers