Andrei Cimpian

Sociology and Political Science · Science · 2015–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 53 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 36 citations into it; #15,385 of 15,694 by trust here, #9,333 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 31 citations into it; #9,513 of 9,731 by trust here, #5,375 by citations
• Gender Studies — 28 citations into it; #2,934 of 4,924 by trust here, #962 by citations
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 11 citations into it
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 11 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 6 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 5 citations into it

Whom Andrei Cimpian trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Andrew F. Hayes
2. A. Greenwald
3. Gregory Walton
4. J. Tainter
5. Nilanjana Dasgupta
6. Brian A. Nosek

Who trusts Andrei Cimpian overall

1. Allison Master
2. Ming-Te Wang
3. Sapna Cheryan
4. Shane T. Mueller
5. Christine R. Starr

Papers from Andrei Cimpian's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrei Cimpian trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
2. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
3. A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
4. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
5. A Brief Social-Belonging Intervention Improves Academic and Health Outcomes of Minority Students (Science)
6. The measurement of psychological androgyny.
7. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
8. The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
9. Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat
10. Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model

Their papers

• Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests (2017) — 1,037 citations
• Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women (2020) — 99 citations
• Women—particularly underrepresented minority women—and early-career academics feel like impostors in fields that value brilliance. (2021) — 95 citations
• Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities (2018) — 153 citations
• Why Do People Tend to Infer “Ought” From “Is”? The Role of Biases in Explanation (2016) — 67 citations
• Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines (2015) — 1,370 citations