Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women
By Daniel Storage, Tessa E. S. Charlesworth, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Andrei Cimpian. 2020
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Women are underrepresented in careers where success is perceived to depend on high levels of intellectual ability (e.g., brilliance, genius), including those in science and technology. This phenomenon may be due in part to a gender-brilliance stereotype that portrays men as more brilliant than women. Here, we offer the first investigation of whether people implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women. Implicit measures are absent from prior research on the gender-brilliance stereotype, despite having the potential to contribute unique information about the prevalence of this stereotype. Across 5 studies (N = 3618) with 17 Implicit Association Tests using 6 distinct comparison traits (e.g., creative, funny), we found consistent evidence for an implicit gender-brilliance stereotype favoring men. Indeed, for 5 out of 6 comparison traits (even the male-typed trait funny), male was associated with brilliant and female with the comparison trait. Only a physical trait (strong) showed a stronger association with male than brilliant did; none of the psychological traits used as comparisons rivaled brilliant in their association to male. Evidence for the implicit gender-brilliance stereotype was consistently observed whether the male and female targets were represented with verbal labels or pictures, and whether the pictures depicted White or Black targets. Moreover, the results were robust in both men and women, children and adults, across different regions of the U.S. as well as internationally. This pervasive implicit association of brilliance with men is likely to hold women back in careers perceived to require brilliance.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab87d6646427928a3c0418480ba02bd828344a54
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Gender Studies
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Women—particularly underrepresented minority women—and early-career academics feel like impostors in fields that value brilliance. (2021, background): “Because women are targeted by such stereotypes (e.g., Bian et al., 2017; Bian, Leslie, & Cimpian, 2018; Storage et al., 2020), they may be particularly likely to worry about whether they “have what it takes” to do well in brilliance-oriented fields, and about whether their peers and colleagues think”