Diego A. Pizzagalli

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2001–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 80 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Diego A. Pizzagalli trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Jutta Joormann
  2. Ian H. Gotlib
  3. Kent C. Berridge
  4. Richard J. Davidson
  5. Wendy Treynor
  6. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
  7. Hiram E. Fitzgerald
  8. Helen S. Mayberg
  9. Mauricio R. Delgado
  10. G. Bush

Who trusts Diego A. Pizzagalli overall

  1. Michael T. Treadway
  2. Justin Riddle
  3. Jan Wacker
  4. Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui
  5. Richard J. Davidson
  6. David H. Zald
  7. Dawn A. Matsumoto
  8. Joseph L. Price
  9. E. Frangos
  10. F. Frohlich

Papers from Diego A. Pizzagalli's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Diego A. Pizzagalli trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  2. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.
  3. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  4. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
  5. A default mode of brain function.
  6. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. (Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  7. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. (Archives of General Psychiatry)
  8. The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. (Cerebral Cortex)
  9. Modulating emotional responses: effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system (NeuroReport)
  10. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Their papers