E. Loder
Statistics and Probability · 2013–2022
A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 190 citations into it
- General Health Professions — 101 citations into it
- Economics and Econometrics — 70 citations into it
Whom E. Loder trusts
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- David Moher (in Statistics and Probability)
- Douglas G. Altman (in Statistics and Probability)
- K. F. Schulz (in Statistics and Probability)
Papers from E. Loder's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers E. Loder trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PLoS ONE)
Their papers
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 10,812 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 94,440 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) — 3,176 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022) — 1,522 citations
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration (2021) — 1,401 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) — 25,061 citations
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement. (2021) — 3,318 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013) — 1,835 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) — 2,158 citations