John MacFarlane

Philosophy · 2000–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Philosophy — 15 citations into it; #281 of 1,040 by trust here, #479 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 10 citations into it; #4,695 of 9,731 by trust here, #8,664 by citations
• Language and Linguistics — 6 citations into it
• Artificial Intelligence — 5 citations into it

Whom John MacFarlane trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Peter Lasersohn
2. Philip N. Johnson-Laird
3. Friederike Moltmann
4. Angelika Kratzer
5. Tamina Stephenson
6. Bart Geurts
7. Hans Kamp
8. Christopher Kennedy
9. Philippe Schlenker
10. Alan D. Sokal

Who trusts John MacFarlane overall

1. Daniel Lassiter
2. Friederike Moltmann
3. Dilip Ninan
4. N. Kolodny
5. Peter Milne
6. Katherine Hawley
7. Catarina Dutilh Novaes
8. David Plunkett
9. Jonathan Schaffer
10. Sarah Moss

Papers from John MacFarlane's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers John MacFarlane trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste*
2. Making sense of relative truth
3. Relative truth and the first person
4. Relativism and Monadic Truth
5. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism
6. Logic and Reasoning
7. Meaning and Speech Acts
8. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism
9. Questions
10. Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World

Their papers

• Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications (2014) — 650 citations
• Making sense of relative truth (2005) — 324 citations
• In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought (2004) — 133 citations
• WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT LOGIC IS FORMAL (2000) — 139 citations