Relativism and Monadic Truth

By H. Cappelen, J. Hawthorne. 2009

351 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f623c8e224f287aca06b38e791591b42db683d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. John MacFarlane
2. Jonathan Schaffer

In Philosophy

1. Jonathan Schaffer
2. John MacFarlane

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications (2014, background): “For this reason, Cappelen and Hawthorne (2009) note that we should be cautious about relying solely on examples using generics in arguing against contextualist theories.”
• Perspective in Taste Predicates and Epistemic Modals (2011, background): “See Schaffer (forthcoming and MS) for further discussion, and Cappelen and Hawthorne (2009) for a different version of the view that propositions are true or false simpliciter, which does not invoke world arguments.”