Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World
By N. Belnap, M. Perloff, Ming Xu. 2001
515 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef82a547cffda48342848f02fedb4bd8b41940d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought (2004, background): “2. The force of “you ought not ” is not “it is not the case that you ought to ,” but rather “you are forbidden to ,” which following Belnap, Perloff, and Xu 2001 I understand as “it is obligatory that you refrain from ing,” that is, “it is obligatory that you see to it that you do not .””
- We-Intentions Revisited (2005, background): “…closed; he keeps it open, if some other agent or something else tries to close it; the agent gets some other agent to open the window, if it is closed; he refrains from preventing another agent from opening the window (see Sandu and Tuomela, 1996; also cf. Belnap et al., 2001, for stit and jstit.)”