Questions

By T. Gonen, J. Ravindranadh. 1927

Subfields: Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

Citations in the corpus

Natural language question answering: the view from here (2001, background): “While this study by no means started with them (e.g. see Hamblin (1967) for references to philosophical work on questions in Aristotle, medieval logic, and the 19th-century), their work is an early expression of what became, over the next 20 years, a serious attempt to apply formal logical…”
Must . . . stay . . . strong! (2010, background): “Our story here (plus or minus just a bit) is the standard partitioning semantics for questions (Groenendijk & Stokhof 1984, 1997), and that in turn is equivalent to a story about aboutness (Lewis 1988).”
Lexical Functional Grammar (2001, unknown): “Hellan (1988), Dalrymple and Zaenen (1991), and Dalrymple (1993) discuss Norwegian data that point to a similar conclusion.”
Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives (2006, background): “Following Groenendijk & Stokhof (1997), I take the meaning of a question to be a partition over possible worlds.”
Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr (2015, background): “(cid:129) Learning: Learning is an important motivation which enables people to actively participate in a variety of activities in social media (Nam et al., 2009; Nov, 2007; Rafaeli et al., 2005).”
Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications (2014, background): “But on her view, there is also a syntactic difference: in the exocentric uses, the “judge” argument place of “tasty” is filled by a null pronoun, while in the autocentric uses, it is filled by PROJ . 16Stephenson (2007) criticizes Lasersohn’s account of exocentric uses on other grounds.”
Deliberative modality under epistemic uncertainty (2013, background): “The possibility for the former to leave out a non-empty set of worlds at which no action is taken is reminiscent of the residual answer in the latter (Hamblin, 1958).”
RHETORICAL QUESTIONS AS QUESTIONS (2007, methodology): “1 Following Groenendijk and Stokhof (1996), we will use the term interrogative (clause/sentence) to refer to a particular kind of syntactic structure that is characterized by a certain word order, intonation, and/or lexical items, while question will be used to refer to the semantic content of an in”
Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system (2001, background): “…Options and Criteria) is another interesting model to represent the rationale of reasoning in a decision making process [Shum et al., 1993; MacLean et al., 1991], in that it provides users the means to represent and integrate rationale of varying degrees of stability, at different stages…”