J. Kleijnen

Statistics and Probability · 2000–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 16 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 165 citations into it; #7,428 of 12,932 by trust here, #154 by citations
• General Health Professions — 59 citations into it; #2,126 of 4,781 by trust here, #27 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 57 citations into it
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 45 citations into it

Whom J. Kleijnen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Julian P. T. Higgins

Who trusts J. Kleijnen overall

1. David Moher
2. Georgia Salanti
3. Douglas G. Altman
4. A. Vedel
5. Matthew J. Page
6. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt

Papers from J. Kleijnen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Kleijnen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
2. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
3. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
4. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
5. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
6. Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research (PLoS Medicine)
7. Prediction of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in a Population-based Surgical Cohort (Anesthesiology)
8. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
9. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
10. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (Statistical Methods in Medical Research)

Their papers

• The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) — 37,422 citations
• The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) — 15,061 citations
• Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004) — 836 citations
• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2019) — 2,019 citations
• A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018) — 749 citations
• Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017) — 1,785 citations
• PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2019) — 1,227 citations
• The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003) — 1,392 citations
• Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2015) — 1,968 citations
• Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2014) — 11,185 citations
• Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis (2008) — 750 citations
• Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006) — 726 citations
• Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity (2005) — 1,220 citations
• Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review (2003) — 1,754 citations
• Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. (2001) — 1,332 citations
• Systematic review of water fluoridation (2000) — 634 citations