International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database

By Zan Huang, Hsinchun Chen, Zhi-kai Chen, Mihail C. Roco. 2004

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Molecular Biology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/667064a79b3ae31b53e9778176b9b3fa802e5c7a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. Alan L. Porter
2. Ronald N. Kostoff
3. Clifford G. Y. Lau
4. Dustin Johnson
5. Jesse A. Stump
6. Mihail C. Roco
7. W. Tolles
8. James Murday

In Molecular Biology

1. Alan L. Porter
2. Mihail C. Roco
3. H. M. Azeredo

In Statistics and Probability

1. Alan L. Porter
2. Mihail C. Roco
3. Catherine Beaudry
4. Sedki Allaoui
5. Christine L. Borgman
6. Jonathan Furner

Citations in the corpus

• The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years (2011, result): “About 0.9 percent of patent M.C. Roco xxxix applications published worldwide, and about 1.1 percent at USPTO in 2008 in all areas, included nanoscale science and engineering aspects.”
• The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature (2006, methodology): “Also in this table are the most prolific patentpublishing instutions (for nanotechnology patents granted by the US Patent Office) in 2003, according to [Huang et al, 2004].”
• Refining search terms for nanotechnology (2008, background): “The Huang et al. (2003, 2004) articles also provided insights on nanotechnology trends.”