J. Mauskopf
Statistics and Probability · 2007–2022
A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 16 citations into it
Whom J. Mauskopf trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from J. Mauskopf's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Mauskopf trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. (Value in Health)
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
- Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses (British medical journal)
- CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
- The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting.
- The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. (Journal of Health Economics)
- Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity: A Modelling Study (PLoS Medicine)
- Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. (The Lancet)
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
Their papers
- Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. (2011) — 1,934 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations (2022) — 1,522 citations
- Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. (2014) — 1,014 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013) — 1,835 citations
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013) — 2,158 citations
- Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis. (2007) — 733 citations