Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity: A Modelling Study

By L. Cobiac, Theo Vos, J. Barendregt. PLoS Medicine, 2009

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Linda Cobiac and colleagues model the costs and health outcomes associated with interventions to improve physical activity in the population, and identify specific interventions that are likely to be cost-saving.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f01b4f4fad42c5798a0ce6140f712824e2c1a9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. E. Loder
2. David Moher
3. A. Briggs
4. M. Nieuwenhuijsen
5. Douglas G. Altman
6. K. F. Schulz

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. David Moher
2. Luc Int Panis
3. Douglas G. Altman
4. K. F. Schulz

Citations in the corpus

• Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013, methodology): “Example: In Australia, a standardised approach to assessing costeffectiveness (ACE) has been developed y [51] Explanation: An economic evaluation addresses a question relevant to the place and setting in which the resource allocation decision is being contemplated.”
• Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. (2015, methodology): “There is also concern for decay of behavioral effects over time (Cobiac et al., 2009; Hoffman et al., 2012).”