The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

By J. Brazier, Jennifer Roberts, M. Deverill. Journal of Health Economics, 2002

3,103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aee4cbcc88f4155e49a0fff0b72a56a5541b54b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Dan J Stein
2. S. Walters
3. Murray B. Stein
4. J. Brazier
5. Michael Grimsley
6. J. Gilbertson
7. G. Green
8. E. Loder

In General Health Professions

1. Murray B. Stein
2. S. Walters
3. Dan J Stein
4. J. Brazier
5. Michael Grimsley
6. J. Gilbertson
7. G. Green
8. E. Loder

Citations in the corpus

• Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. (2013, background): “This may involve the use of a multiattribute utility measure—a generic health-related quality-of-life instrument with preexisting preference weights (utility values) that can be attached to each health state [70–72].”
• Social Anxiety Disorder (2008, methodology): “The primary outcome of the analysis was the HRQoL of study participants, measured by Short Form Questionnaire Six Dimensional Health State Classification (SF-6D) utility scores (Brazier et al., 2002).”
• Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D (2005, methodology): “Therefore we used both distribution and anchor-based approaches to try to establish the interpretability of the SF-6D [15], a new single summary preference-based measure of health derived from the SF-36, and the EQ-5D [16], another well known measure of HRQoL.”
• Psychosocial routes from housing investment to health: Evidence from England's home energy efficiency scheme (2012, methodology): “The household questionnaire also included the self reported health and well being measures used in this paper, namely the 12 items General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) the five item European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EuroQuol 5D, EQ-5D) and the 36 item Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36) which ca”
• Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? (2016, background): “The SF-36 and the EQ-5D are described variously as measures of ‘health status’ [1, 2], ‘health-related quality of life’ (HRQoL) [3, 4], or ‘quality of life’ (QoL) [5–7].”
• A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. (2004, background): “The resultant algorithm can be used to convert SF-36 data at the individual level to a preference-based index.b These instruments have previously been reviewed against the criteria of practicality, reliability, and validity.”