Peter Tugwell

Statistics and Probability · 2000–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 19 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 56 citations into it; #3,080 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,069 by citations

Whom Peter Tugwell trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Douglas G. Altman
2. David Moher

Who trusts Peter Tugwell overall

1. Bridget Cooper
2. Daniela Soares Cruzes
3. Philip Vickerman
4. Jianmu Ye
5. Nan Zheng
6. Donato Masi
7. A. Irvine
8. Tore Dybå
9. Janine K. Coates
10. K. Kulathunga

Papers from Peter Tugwell's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Peter Tugwell trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
2. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
3. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
4. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
5. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
6. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
7. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
8. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
9. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
10. Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty

Their papers

• ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016) — 17,786 citations
• Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000) — 788 citations
• How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016) — 936 citations
• Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012) — 1,488 citations
• PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity (2012) — 614 citations
• Real world research. (2010) — 3,177 citations
• Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011) — 339 citations
• Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. (2014) — 757 citations
• How to do a good systematic review of effects in international development: a tool kit (2012) — 257 citations
• CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. (2017) — 1,950 citations
• Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. (2014) — 1,333 citations
• The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014) — 26,308 citations
• American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee (2012) — 2,837 citations
• What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews (2012) — 879 citations
• Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview. (2011) — 952 citations
• OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: part III: Changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. (2010) — 1,767 citations
• OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. (2008) — 2,892 citations
• OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. (2007) — 853 citations
• Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. (2002) — 599 citations