Suresh Kumar Goyal

Management Information Systems · 2001–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 13 papers; trusts 24 researchers and is trusted by 33 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Suresh Kumar Goyal trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Chao-Kuei Huang
  2. Mohamad Y. Jaber
  3. Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón
  4. Deng Yong
  5. Chitrasen Samantra
  6. Chen-Tung Chen
  7. Charles J. Corbett
  8. Chunguang Bai

Who trusts Suresh Kumar Goyal overall

  1. Biswajit Sarkar
  2. Chung-Yuan Dye
  3. Hui-Ling Yang
  4. Chun-Tao Chang
  5. Liang-Yuh Ouyang
  6. Shib Sankar Sana
  7. Renzo Akkerman
  8. Jinn-Tsair Teng
  9. Ata Allah Taleizadeh
  10. Chao-Kuei Huang

Papers from Suresh Kumar Goyal's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Suresh Kumar Goyal trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Detecting change in vague interpretations of landscapes
  2. Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality – a practical approach
  3. An integrated vendor-buyer cooperative inventory model for items with imperfect quality
  4. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management
  5. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (European Journal of Operational Research)
  6. An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective (European Journal of Operational Research)
  7. Coordination Mechanisms for a Distribution System with One Supplier and Multiple Retailers (Management Sciences)
  8. Facility Location Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Under Group Decisions (Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst.)
  9. A joint approach for setting unit price and the length of the credit period for a seller when end demand is price sensitive
  10. Retailer's pricing, credit and inventory policies for deteriorating items in response to temporary price/credit incentives

Their papers