The Design of Experiments
By J. I.. 1936
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Susan Athey
- Guido W. Imbens
- Kosuke Imai
- Peng Ding
- Stefan Wager
- M. D. Cattaneo
- José R. Zubizarreta
- Luke Keele
Citations in the corpus
- Framing Image Description as a Ranking Task: Data, Models and Evaluation Metrics (2013, methodology): “6 We use Fisher’s Randomization Test (Fisher, 1935; Smucker, Allan, & Carterette, 2007) to assess the statistical significance of the difference between models.”
- Deconfounding Reinforcement Learning in Observational Settings (2018, methodology): “The do-operator can be executed in two common ways: by Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) (Fisher, 1935) and by adjustment formulas (i.e., Back-door criterion and Front-door criterion) (Pearl, 2009).”
- The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure (2018, background): “Conditional independences lie at the heart of several fundamental concepts such as sufficiency [21] and ancillarity [22, 23]; see also Jensen and Sørensen [28].”
- The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments (2016, methodology): “First, we study the calculation of exact p-values for sharp hypotheses, based on the work by Fisher (1925, 1935).”
- The State of Applied Econometrics - Causality and Policy Evaluation (2016, neutral): “Some researchers have raised concerns with the regression approach in small samples (Freedman [2006, 2008], Young [2015], Athey and Imbens [2016], Imbens and Rubin [2015]), but generally such analyses are justified at least in large samples, even in settings with many covariates (Bloniarz et al.”
- Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings (2014, methodology): “To establish causation, we start with the approach of Fisher (our tool’s namesake) to randomized hypothesis testing [12] as specialized by Tschantz et al. for the setting of online systems [3].”
- The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Testing Statistical Significance in Natural Language Processing (2018, methodology): “Paired Student’s t-test This test assesses whether the population means of two sets of measurements differ from each other, and is based on the assumption that both samples come from a normal distribution (Fisher, 1937).”
- Field Experiments in Economics: the Past, the Present, and the Future (2008, unknown): “…Fisher's insights are exemplified by this passage concerning what constituted a valid randomization scheme for a completely randomized block design (Fisher, 1935, p. 26): The validity of our estimate of error for this purpose is guaranteed by the provision that any two plots, not in the same…”
- Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference (2007, unknown): “By randomly allocating levels of “treatment” to “experimental units”, the randomised experiment of Fisher (1926) renders two of the three elemental causal explanations for an observed association between a treatment and a response — reverse causation and confounding — highly unlikely.”
- A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation (2007, background): “2.1 Randomization Test For Fisher s randomization test [1, 4, 8, 9], our null hypothesis is that system A and system B are identical and thus system A has no e.ect compared to system B on the mean average precision for the given topics, corpora, and relevance judgments.”
- Decision Theoretic Approaches to Experiment Design and External Validity (2016, unknown): “Fisher (1926) was the first to provide a detailed program for randomization, which he expanded into his classic text on experimental design (Fisher, 1935).”
- Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects (2021, background): “As in classical randomization tests (Fisher, 1935), design-based inference takes care of these complications by conditioning on the sample and considering only the variation in the test statistic that is induced by the assignment mechanism (see, e.”
- A History of Effect Size Indices (2002, background): “It is interesting that the many editions of the two Fisher (1925, 1935) books (Statistical Methods for Research Workers and The Design of Experiments) did not make the connection.”
- Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? (2008, background): “Seemingly contradictory, “financial constraints” as an obstacle to innovation is found to be positively associated with university collaboration.”
- A paradox from randomization-based causal inference (2014, methodology): “On the other hand, Fisher (1935a) focused on testing the sharp null hypothesis of zero individual causal effect, and proposed the Fisher Randomization Test (FRT).”
- Performance Trajectories and Performance Gaps as Achievement Effect-Size Benchmarks for Educational Interventions (2008, methodology): “This confusion reflects, in part, differences between the framework for statistical inference developed by Fisher (1949), which focuses on testing a specific null hypothesis of zero effect against a general alternative hypothesis of nonzero effect, versus the framework developed by Neyman and…”
- RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control (2023, methodology): “To reduce the variance of these experiment, we evaluate all of the methods using the A/B testing framework [80], where all four models are evaluated one after another in the exact same conditions.”
- Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects (2008, background): “When drawing inferences about the results’ external validity, it is important to note that these children are not representative of the average American child; nevertheless, many of their attributes are not unusual for African-American youth in poor neighborhoods (Miller 1992).”