R. Maertens

Sociology and Political Science · 2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 20 citations into it; #21,665 of 22,756 by trust here, #20,051 by citations
• Literature and Literary Theory — 6 citations into it; #2,383 of 2,496 by trust here, #2,007 by citations

Whom R. Maertens trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Dietram A. Scheufele
2. John Cook
3. Soroush Vosoughi
4. Stephan Lewandowsky
5. Nicole M. Krause
6. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
7. S. van der Linden
8. Deb K. Roy

Who trusts R. Maertens overall

1. J. Compton
2. S. van der Linden
3. Stephan Lewandowsky

Papers from R. Maertens's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Maertens trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The spread of true and false news online
2. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
3. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
4. The case for motivated reasoning.
5. In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media
6. Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’
7. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
8. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence
9. Motivated Rejection of Science
10. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence

Their papers

• Combatting climate change misinformation: Evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects (2020) — 124 citations