G. Úrrutia
Statistics and Probability · 2010–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 33 citations into it
- General Health Professions — 16 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 12 citations into it
- History and Philosophy of Science — 5 citations into it
Whom G. Úrrutia trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from G. Úrrutia's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers G. Úrrutia trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)