Andrew P. Martin

Genetics · 2003–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Andrew P. Martin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. I. Lovette
  2. David Posada
  3. Keith A. Crandall
  4. Paul D. N. Hebert
  5. Alexandros Stamatakis

Who trusts Andrew P. Martin overall

  1. Joel W. Martin
  2. M. Vences
  3. Christoph Held
  4. Walter Cho
  5. P. Rosel
  6. T. J. Page
  7. Keith A. Crandall
  8. Fernanda G. Vergamini
  9. L. Prendini
  10. G. Ortí

Papers from Andrew P. Martin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrew P. Martin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
  2. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. (Molecular biology and evolution)
  3. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies (Molecular Ecology)
  4. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  5. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. (Systematic Biology)
  6. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
  7. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences)
  8. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding
  9. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates (Journal of Molecular Evolution)
  10. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)

Their papers