Tony Ross-Hellauer
F1000Research · 2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom Tony Ross-Hellauer trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Tony Ross-Hellauer overall
Papers from Tony Ross-Hellauer's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Tony Ross-Hellauer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (PLoS ONE)
- A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems
- Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine)
- Open access (Cell Cycle)
- Gender bias in the refereeing process
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
- How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
- Effect of an Indo-Mediterranean diet on progression of coronary artery disease in high risk patients (Indo-Mediterranean Diet Heart Study): a randomised single-blind trial. (The Lancet)
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (Infection and Immunity)
- Ontologies: How can They be Built? (Knowledge and Information Systems)
Their papers
- What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017) — 397 citations