Open access
By G. Franck. Cell Cycle, 2012
1,340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Scientific communication is a misnomer. The process of scientific publication is much less a forum where information is exchanged for information than a market where information is exchanged for attention. Nevertheless, the exchange of information for attention is a somewhat peculiar market, since it seems much more natural to sell the information one has produced laboriously for money. Why publish a discovery, why share it with other researchers when knowledge is power?
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88a68d17ff768d8a048c3c3eb5a8123e8c3d5f49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017, background): “” (Suber, 2012) Page 4 of 32 Within just these two examples, there are already a multitude of factors at play, including the removal of anonymity, the publishing of review reports, interaction between participants, crowdsourcing of reviews, and making manuscripts public pre-review, amongst others.”