Gender bias in the refereeing process

By Tom Tregenza. 2002

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0814b964326e40be34adc6b2e00862aed98e194

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Women in Academic Science (2014, result): “…Association revealed no association between author gender and acceptance ( J. R. Gilbert et al., 1994), a finding repeatedly found for other journals (e.g., Blank, 1991; J. Brooks & Della Sala, 2009; Grant et al., 1997; Hammerschmidt et al., 2008; Nature Neuroscience, 2006; Tregenza, 2002).”
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011, background): “One (23) compared publication success rates for 2,680 papers with male vs.”
The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology (2009, background): “The greater number of publications from English-speaking countries is also consistent with previous findings which showed that articles written by authors from native English speaking countries were more likely to be accepted for publication (Tregenza 2002).”
Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review (2018, background): “, [2,90]) or of the corresponding author (e.”
What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017, background): “• Social and publication biases: Although often idealized as impartial, objective assessors, in reality studies suggest that peer reviewers may be subject to social biases on the grounds of gender (Budden et al., 2008; Lloyd, 1990; Tregenza, 2002), nationality (Daniel, 1993; Ernst & Kienbacher, 1991”
The contribution of scientific information to the conservation and management of freshwater biodiversity in tropical Asia (2003, background): “…limnological literature towards an increase in both the number of authors on each paper, which may improve the chances of acceptance for publication (see Tregenza, 2002), and a rise in the proportion of papers co-authored by scientists in different countries (Burns, 2002; Wishart & Davies, 2002).”
Bias in peer review (2013, unknown): “Tregenza (2002) found that acceptance rates at ecology and evolution journals were higher for first authors living in wealthy English-speaking nations versus wealthy non-English-speaking nations.”