Seperia B. Wanyama

Statistics and Probability · 2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Seperia B. Wanyama trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. J. Webster
  2. Philippe Mongeon
  3. Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in
  4. Matthew E. Falagas
  5. David Moher
  6. Richard Thomas Watson
  7. Adèle Paul-Hus
  8. Enrique Orduña-Malea

Papers from Seperia B. Wanyama's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Seperia B. Wanyama trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (MIS Q.)
  2. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (J. Informetrics)
  3. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (The FASEB Journal)
  4. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (Scientometrics)
  5. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (Systematic Reviews)
  6. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. (Journal Chiropractic Medicine)
  7. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
  8. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
  9. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
  10. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

Their papers