Michael Gusenbauer

Statistics and Probability · 2018–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 23 citations into it; #3,082 of 12,932 by trust here, #4,809 by citations
• Information Systems — 20 citations into it; #1,663 of 8,771 by trust here, #5,713 by citations

Whom Michael Gusenbauer trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. W. Bruce Croft
2. Judit Bar-Ilan
3. Neal R Haddaway
4. Mike Thelwall
5. Donald Metzler
6. Henk F. Moed
7. Trevor Strohman
8. Lokman I. Meho
9. Madian Khabsa
10. Miriam J. Metzger

Who trusts Michael Gusenbauer overall

1. Raminta Pranckute
2. M. Hiebl
3. Anna Markella Antoniadi
4. Saif M. Mohammad
5. Neal R Haddaway
6. Dana Pessach
7. Yuhan Du
8. Michail Kalogiannakis
9. Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in
10. R. O’Dea

Papers from Michael Gusenbauer's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Michael Gusenbauer trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
2. Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice
3. Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making)
4. How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs (Information Processing & Management)
5. The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (ASLIB Proceedings)
6. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (The FASEB Journal)
7. Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support (Communications of the Association for Information Systems)
8. The myths of the digital native and the multitasker
9. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
10. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (Research Synthesis Methods)

Their papers

• Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2020) — 2,016 citations
• Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018) — 641 citations