Wondimagegn Mengist

Statistics and Probability · 2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Wondimagegn Mengist trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Lori B. Shelby
  2. David Moher
  3. Jerry J. Vaske
  4. A. Liberati

Who trusts Wondimagegn Mengist overall

  1. Hanane Allioui
  2. Michel Eustáquio Dantas Chaves
  3. Angela Carrera-Rivera
  4. Youssef Mourdi
  5. Michelle Cristina Araújo Picoli
  6. William Ochoa-Agurto

Papers from Wondimagegn Mengist's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Wondimagegn Mengist trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Understanding Meta-Analysis: A Review of the Methodological Literature
  2. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  3. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  4. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world
  5. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
  6. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  7. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
  8. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  9. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
  10. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)

Their papers