Luke A. McGuinness

Statistics and Probability · 2020–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 7 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Luke A. McGuinness trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Cedric E. Ginestet
  2. Julian P. T. Higgins
  3. J. Sterne
  4. David Moher

Papers from Luke A. McGuinness's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Luke A. McGuinness trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
  2. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  3. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  4. The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  5. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
  6. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
  7. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
  8. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  9. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  10. Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PLoS ONE)

Their papers