Emotional Intelligence: What Does the Research Really Indicate?
By C. Cherniss, M. Extein, D. Goleman, R. Weissberg. 2006
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffd2f60701b05376ccaf5b652a193b1c3aa9ea00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Education
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Reflecting on Social Emotional Learning: A Critical Perspective on Trends in the United States (2009, background): “Although some educators may see SEL as yet another burden in the already over-taxed academic and social climate of contemporary public schooling, SEL advocates point to a small but growing body of evaluation literature that shows links between SEL programs and improved outcomes in a variety of areas”
- Inadequate Evidence for Multiple Intelligences, Mozart Effect, and Emotional Intelligence Theories (2006, background): “EI Is Not a Basis for Moral Conduct Cherniss et al. (2006) claimed that programs such as social emotional learning (SEL) could be used to “enhance positive youth development and mental health, reduce substance use and antisocial behavior, and improve educational outcomes.””