Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of abstract structure in 2.5‐year‐olds’ interpretations of novel verbs
By Cynthia Fisher. 2002
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe2f07db9fc86471be688e22ba6eefed31599947
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Franklin Chang
- Gary S. Dell
- Kathryn Bock
- Jesse Snedeker
- Malathi Thothathiri
- Thea Cameron-Faulkner
- Michael Tomasello
- Martin J. Pickering
Citations in the corpus
- Becoming syntactic. (2006, background): “This task thus provides evidence for early-syntax approaches that posit some syntaxspecific tendency to learn abstract structure (Fisher, 2002a; Gleitman , 1990; Naigles, 2002).”
- A Construction Based Analysis of Child Directed Speech. (2003, background): “Thus, to give just two examples, children’s ability to generalize verb morphology to novel verbs develops after they are already well able to do this for novel nouns (Tomasello, Akhtar, Dodson, & Rekau, 1997); their ability to correct ungrammatical utterances with novel verbs to canonical word order”
- Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children (2008, background): “Developmentally, there is a tension between evidence for early abstract representations (e.g., Fisher, 2002b) and item-specific use (e.g., Tomasello, 2000a) in children.”