Assessment in medical education.
By K. Parakh. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
1,168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fcd86c552ac8acd3cc2836de6e49f14120bf751c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Holmboe
- Kai Siang Chan
- Mark J. Gierl
- Qi Guo
- Xinxin Zhang
- N. Zary
- K. Hauer
- Okan Bulut
Citations in the corpus
- Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. (2009, methodology): “In-training evaluation encounter card82 Internal medicine History, examination, communication, counseling (7) Scale (1-5) with adjective anchors No Yes Interencounter reliability No No”
- Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review (2019, background): “There are many forms of examination in medicine, the most common of which is the written examination and the Objective Structured Clinical Examinations [56].”
- Developing, Analyzing, and Using Distractors for Multiple-Choice Tests in Education: A Comprehensive Review (2017, methodology): “…(i.e., three distractors and one correct answer) or five response options (four distractors and one correct answer) are recommended by most authors of measurement textbooks and are widely used in educational testing (Delgado & Prieto, 1998; Epstein, 2007; Sidick et al., 1994; Vyas & Supe, 2008).”