Utilisation of the oceanic habitat by king penguins over the annual cycle

By J. Charrassin, C. Bost. 2001

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e58353bc2fcbfd9276f8aa5dfbb8e03fcb46f182

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “In some species (including albatrosses, petrels and penguins), parents are forced to forage closer to the colony than in any other stage (Hull 2000, Charrassin & Bost 2001, Phillips et al. 2004, González-Solís et al. 2007), even though the areas visited may not be optimal, leading to progressive…”
Marine Birds and Climate Fluctuation in the North Atlantic (2005, background): “As a consequence, seabird populations are associated with these physical features (Hunt 1990; Schneider 1990); for example, the distribution of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic seabirds is closely linked to the polar front and sub-Antarctic front (Hunt 1991; Guinet et al. 1997; Ainley et al. 1998; Charra”
Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability (2007, background): “As an example, telemetric studies showed that the King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonica prefers to exploit the polar front located 340 to 450 km to the south of their breeding site, and dive to the depth of the thermocline where prey is concentrated (Charrassin & Bost 2001).”
Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources (2007, unknown): “Aptenodytes patagonicus King penguin Temp Crozet I, B, C No R, T, F Oceanic, front Charrassin et al. (1998), Charrassin and Bost (2001), Bost, C.A., Unpubl.”
Foraging under contrasting oceanographic conditions: the gentoo penguin at Kerguelen Archipelago (2005, background): “The response of any one species will differ according to several parameters such as season, breeding stage and abiotic conditions (Salamolard & Weimerskirch 1993, Hunt et al. 1999, Charassin & Bost 2001, Charassin et al. 2002).”
Nitrogen and carbon isotope values of individual amino acids: a tool to study foraging ecology of penguins in the Southern Ocean (2009, background): “Previous tagging and observational data suggests that these penguins forage at the Polar Front (~50°S) and over the Antarctic shelf (~66°S), respectively (Wienecke et al. 2000; Charrassin & Bost 2001).”
Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean (2009, background): “Penguins preferentially use foraging areas where prey is abundant and predictable (e.g. Croxall, 1984; Croxall et al., 1985; Trivelpiece et al., 1987; Charrassin & Bost, 2001; Kooyman, 2002; Ainley et al., 2004; Bost et al., 2004; Trathan et al., 2006a, 2008a; Zimmer et al., 2008).”
Geographical variation in carbon stable isotope signatures of marine predators: a tool to investigate their foraging areas in the Southern Ocean (2007, background): “An identical signature is consistent with satellite tracking showing that the 2 populations forage in the same marine environment, the Polar Front (Charrassin & Bost 2001, Bost et al. 2002).”
The importance of oceanographic fronts to marine birds and mammals of the southern oceans (2009, background): “The Crozet population is the only one where the use of frontal zones by a top predator has been investigated over the annual breeding cycle (Charrassin and Bost, 2001).”
Mesoscale eddies as foraging area of a deep-diving predator, the southern elephant seal (2010, background): “Several foraging predators, including elephant seals, dive in association with thermoclines, which are strong physical discontinuities that concentrate potential prey items (Charrassin & Bost 2001, Biuw et al. 2007).”