Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000

By Mizuki Kawabata, Qing Shen. 2007

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0660c123a23f959067228e40f9c8fa0a7ffb15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit (2010, background): “…between those who have access to automobiles and those who do not” (Blumenberg ll rights reserved. and Manville, 2004, p. 186).1 Several recent works have demonstrated that travel mode makes a substantial difference in accessing jobs (Hess, 2005; Horner and Mefford, 2007; Kawabata and Shen, 2007).”
Distributive justice and equity in transportation (2016, background): “…on inequality between social groups or geographical areas, asking why certain groups/areas have higher or lower accessibility levels, or more or less transport goods/services than others (Benenson, Martens, Rofé, & Kwartler, 2011; Kawabata & Shen, 2007; Meijers, Hoekstra, Leijten, & Spaans, 2012).”
Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator (2015, background): “It is well known that in most regions of the United States accessibility by auto is far superior to accessibility by transit (Grengs 2010; Kawabata and Shen 2007; Sanchez et al. 2004; Shen 1998).”
Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport (2013, background): “The few existing studies on modal accessibility disparity show that in the majority of US and European urban regions private car provides much better levels of access than public transport (Hess, 2005; Kawabata, 2003; Kawabata and Shen, 2007; Levinson, 1998; Shen, 2001; Silva and Pinho, 2010).”
Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans (2014, background): “While others have investigated inter-modal differences in access and changes in these differences over time (Benenson et al., 2011; Kawabata, 2009; Kawabata and Shen, 2007; Grengs, 2010; Cervero et al., 2002; Foth et al., 2013), we propose to introduce an explicit normative standard to evaluate thes”
Civil rights guidance and equity analysis methods for regional transportation plans: a critical review of literature and practice (2013, background): “…show an independent effect of race/ethnicity, even when controlling for traditional influences on travel behavior including income, family structure, land use, and accessibility (Chung et al., 2001; Giuliano, 2000, 2003; Johnston-Anumonwo, 2000; Kawabata and Shen, 2007; Kockelman, 1997; Liu, 2000).”