A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: developing the discipline and profession
By Jan Dul, Ralph Bruder, P. Buckle, Pascale Carayon, P. Falzon, W. Marras, John R. Wilson, B. van der Doelen. Ergonomics, 2012
828 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5309c102f4d1ff35e4b9b811ea0ef09e7403e2ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Tosha B. Wetterneck
- Peter L. T. Hoonakker
- Ann Schoofs Hundt
- R. Holden
- Ayse P. Gurses
- A. Rivera-Rodriguez
- Pascale Carayon
In Social Psychology
- Gudela Grote
- Tosha B. Wetterneck
- Peter L. T. Hoonakker
- Sharon K. Parker
- Ann Schoofs Hundt
- R. Holden
- Ayse P. Gurses
- A. Rivera-Rodriguez
Citations in the corpus
- Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World (2020, background): “…their homebase of individual-centred research on work and integrate knowledge from: human factors research on human-technology interaction (e.g., Dul et al., 2012); from design thinking and its focus on user participation and experience (e.g., Gruber, De Leon, George, & Thompson, 2015); from…”
- SEIPS 2.0: A human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients (2013, background): “With respect to work outcomes and adaptations, it is important for human factors studies to take into account multiple outcomes: from safety and worker well-being to productivity, efficiency and organisational performance (Dul et al. 2012).”
- Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2016, background): “PE lists the different aspects of the organization of work, whether physical or social although the implementation of this kind of strategy is (and must be) unique to each particular situation and organization [6, 7].”
- SEIPS 3.0: Human-Centered Design of the Patient Journey for Patient Safety (2020, neutral): “The IPO engineering approach can benefit from HFE knowledge to ensure that human considerations are being integrated in the design of work systems in which processes are embedded (Eklund and Yeow, 2015).”
- Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety (2013, background): “Achieving this dual objective is key to HFE as described by Dul et al. (2012).”