Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures

By Johnny Fontaine, Y. Poortinga, L. Delbeke, Shalom H. Schwartz. 2008

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fb5956648eb4dc8bc3d6be208594bf556bc83ccd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, methodology): “This theorized values model structure representing a motivational continuum has been generally supported in subsequent studies using multidimensional scaling and other exploratory methods with university student and schoolteacher samples from up to 67 nations (e.g., Bardi and Schwartz 2003; Fontaine”
Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede’s Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey (2010, methodology): “Fontaine et al. (2008) found that all 55 values of the SVS could be used across cultures in establishing the structure of values at the individual level.”
The Structural Organization of Human Values-Evidence from Three Rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS) (2011, methodology): “Second, Fontaine et al. (2008) noted that shifts in respondents’ understandings of items due to translation or context of administration might be greater in the less developed societies whose languages were more distant from the languages of the majority of samples that contributed to the overall…”
Functional theory of human values: Testing its content and structure hypotheses (2014, background): “, 2011) as well as other values research (Fontaine et al., 2008) have shown that the dimension representing personal versus social values is relatively more stable than the dimension representing survival versus thriving values.”
The (Re)genesis of Values (2015, background): “In the past two and a half decades, the basic categories and structure of values have been confirmed in hundreds of samples taken from 82 nations, and representing various age, cultural, religious, and occupational groups (Schwartz 2012; see also Bilsky, Janik, and Schwartz 2011; Davidov, Schmidt, a”
A comparison of the invariance properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to measure human values across German and Polish Samples (2012, background): “The theory has received empirical support in a large number of cross-cultural studies (e.g., Bilsky, Janik and Schwartz 2011; Fontaine et al. 2008; Schwartz 2006; Schwartz and Rubel-Lifschitz 2009) using data collected in different countries from around the globe.”
Whence Differences in Value Priorities? (2011, background): “Heine et al. (2002) propose that RGE has less impact on measures that entail little social comparison.”
Quiet or questioning? Students' discussion behaviors in student-centered education across cultures (2014, background): “However, the two non-Western cases were also characterized by a strong focus on competition and achievement, which is often associated with individualism rather than collectivism (Fontaine et al. 2008; Liao and Bond 2011).”