Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The psychological effects of meditation: a meta-analysis. (2012, methodology): “Such a design has low internal validity because other potential causal factors (such as the impact of social gatherings, thinking about one’s problems, time passing by, etc.) cannot be controlled (see Rosenthal & Rosnow, 1991; Sedlmeier & Renkewitz, 2007).”
Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education (2007, methodology): “The survey method is typically defined as a methodology aimed to obtain “information about a number of different variables in which the researcher is interested and identify the relationship between those variables” (Haslam & McGarty, 2003, p.54).”
Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. (2010, methodology): “In this case, we converted the F value of the interaction to d using the appropriate formula (e.g., Sedlmeier & Renkewitz, 2007).”
The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis (2011, methodology): “…calculated from raw scores, from the results of significance tests, and from other effect sizes, and can be expressed as standardized differences (d and g) and as the correlation (r) between group membership and values of the dependent variables (e.g., Rosenthal, 1994; Sedlmeier & Renkewitz, 2007).”