Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis.

892 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies (2015, neutral): “6061 Thus, we applied conventional formulas 58 and computed all within-subject effect sizes from raw (vs inferential) statistics.”
A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research (2013, result): “…been proposed that EC effects might often result from the non-automatic acquisition and truth evaluation of propositional knowledge about stimulus relations (De Houwer, 2009a; Mitchell, De Houwer, & Lovibond, 2009), which is supported by the results of a recent meta-analysis (Hofmann et al., 2010).”
Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research (2012, background): “…inferences or statements (e.g., Gast & De Houwer, 2012; Rydell & Gawronski, 2009; Smith, De Houwer, & Nosek, in press), evaluative conditioning (Hofmann et al., 2010), minimal groups manipulations (Paladino & Castelli, 2008) or conditional discrimination tasks (Hughes & Barnes-Holmes, 2011).”
Pain-relief learning in flies, rats, and man: basic research and applied perspectives (2014, background): “Obviously, such explicit measures of valence are possible only in humans as they are influenced by aspects of human nature that we do not conventionally need to reckon with in rats or flies, such as contingency awareness and reflectivity (see Hofmann et al. 2010).”