Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others' Actions.
By I. Liviatan, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008
618 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fae60eacf28019fd1f290f67d24a9ff117acc9d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Yaacov Trope
- Nira Liberman
- Danit Ein-Gar
- Liat Levontin
- Nathan Novemsky
- E. Baskin
- Jaideep Sengupta
In Social Psychology
- Yaacov Trope
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Nira Liberman
- Danit Ein-Gar
- Liat Levontin
- Nathan Novemsky
- E. Baskin
- Jaideep Sengupta
In Sociology and Political Science
- Yaacov Trope
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Danit Ein-Gar
- Liat Levontin
- Nira Liberman
- Nathan Novemsky
- E. Baskin
- Jaideep Sengupta
Citations in the corpus
- Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance (2010, background): “Similar results have been found for other distance dimensions, including hypotheticality and social distance (e.g., Liviatan et al., 2008; Todorov, Goren, & Trope, 2007; see review by Liberman et al., 2007).”
- Growing Followers: Exploring the Effects of Leader Humility on Follower Self‐Expansion, Self‐Efficacy, and Performance (2018, neutral): “On the contrary, interpersonal dissimilarity in age and gender is a preexisting social hindrance that precludes individuals from building close relationships (Brewer, 1968; Karakayali, 2009; Liviatan et al., 2008).”
- Resource Search, Interpersonal Similarity, and Network Tie Valuation in Nascent Entrepreneurs’ Emerging Networks (2012, background): “CLT finds its roots in Heider’s (1958) work on interpersonal perception and the now entrenched notion that interpersonal similarity can be understood as an instantiation of psychological distance (Liviatan et al., 2008; Trope & Liberman, 2003).”
- Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers: A Construal-Level Approach to Gift Giving (2014, methodology): “Study 4C uses a similarity manipulation (Liviatan et al. 2008) that manipulates social distance while keeping other aspects of the relationship, including the friend’s identity, constant.”
- It’s going to be okay: Measuring Access to Support in Online Communities (2018, neutral): “Liviatan et al. (2008) and Li and Feng (2014) found that supportive replies often to contain more emotional language, which evokes a personal connection and intensity (Spottswood et al., 2013; Braithwaite et al., 1999).”
- Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship (2011, background): “The literature on CLT already provides substantial evidence for the first link of this chain of reasoning, namely, that psychological distance influences construal levels (Liviatan et al. 2008; Trope et al. 2007).”
- Explicating the privacy paradox: A qualitative inquiry of online shopping consumers (2020, background): “Social distance relates to the level of personal closeness to something (Liviatan et al., 2008).”
- Giving from a distance: Putting the charitable organization at the center of the donation appeal (2013, methodology): “Furthermore, it has been shown that people construe out-group members using more abstract, primary concepts such as stereotypes and traits than in-group members (Liviatan et al., 2008; Trope & Liberman, 2003).”