It’s going to be okay: Measuring Access to Support in Online Communities

By Zijian Wang, David Jurgens. 2018

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

People use online platforms to seek out support for their informational and emotional needs. Here, we ask what effect does revealing one’s gender have on receiving support. To answer this, we create (i) a new dataset and method for identifying supportive replies and (ii) new methods for inferring gender from text and name. We apply these methods to create a new massive corpus of 102M online interactions with gender-labeled users, each rated by degree of supportiveness. Our analysis shows wide-spread and consistent disparity in support: identifying as a woman is associated with higher rates of support - but also higher rates of disparagement.

Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Natural Language Processing, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

  1. Diyi Yang
  2. Yang Trista Cao
  3. Hal Daumé Iii
  4. Dirk Hovy
  5. Christopher Potts
  6. Isar Nejadgholi
  7. Svetlana Kiritchenko
  8. Zeerak Talat

In Gender Studies

  1. Hal Daumé Iii
  2. Yang Trista Cao
  3. Eshwar Chandrasekharan
  4. David Jurgens
  5. Zijian Wang

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Diyi Yang
  2. Hal Daumé Iii
  3. Yang Trista Cao
  4. Dirk Hovy
  5. David Jurgens
  6. Christopher Potts
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Libby Hemphill

In Human-Computer Interaction

  1. Hal Daumé Iii
  2. Yang Trista Cao
  3. Dirk Hovy
  4. Seth C. Lewis
  5. Andrea L. Guzman

In Social Sciences & Humanities

  1. Hal Daumé Iii
  2. Yang Trista Cao
  3. Christopher Potts
  4. Dirk Hovy

Citations in the corpus