Patient non-compliance with paper diaries

By Arthur A. Stone, Saul Shiffman, J. Schwartz, J. Broderick, M. Hufford. British medical journal, 2002

829 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa7362653cde1df677f2bce06810aebf6ca6b177

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably? (2006, methodology): “Both studies used paper-and-pencil diaries, and timing of completion cannot be objectively verified with this method ( Stone, Shiffman, Schwartz, Broderick, & Hufford, 2002 ).”
Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. (2003, background): “A brief report of the primary findings has recently appeared [14]; this paper provides a detailed description of the”
Viewpoint: Measuring and Understanding Subjective Well-Being (2010, positive): “been shown that later recalls differ from in-the-moment assessments (Stone et al. 2002), the mood assessments are matched to the activity reports, so the overall cost of collection does not differ much from that of a regular time-use survey.”
Self-Monitoring in Weight Loss: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2011, neutral): “The electronic data were compared to the self-reported record of self-monitoring and revealed that there was little concordance between the selfreported and electronically documented data (35,37).”
The Brief State Rumination Inventory (BSRI): Validation and Psychometric Evaluation (2018, background): “1 3 integrated in computer-based applications and computerized experiments, which facilitates data collection and increases responder’s compliance (Ryan et al. 2002; Stone et al. 2002).”
Using a Live-In Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research (2006, background): “Accurate labels for the activity and contexts of such datasets are often dependent on participant recall or diary recordings, both of which have been demonstrated to be error-prone [2] [3].”
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding. (2011, background): “In a trial directly comparing the two modes, patients were compliant with more than 90% of electronic diary assessments, but only 11% of paper diary assessments [11].”
World happiness report (2012, neutral): “Kahneman (2011), Stone et al. (2002).”
Mobile phone mood charting for adolescents (2008, result): “This study also found that most participants engaged in hoarding (Stone et al., 2002).”
Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines (2002, background): “We recently completed a study that confirmed our concerns about compliance with paper-and-pencil diaries ( 21 ).”
Measuring and Understanding Subjective Well-Being (2010, background): “Although it has been shown that later recalls differ from in-the-moment assessments (Stone et al 2002), the mood assessments are matched to the activity reports, so the overall cost of collection does not differ much from that of a regular time-use survey.”