Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries.

By Arthur A. Stone, Saul Shiffman, J. Schwartz, J. Broderick, M. Hufford. Controlled Clinical Trials, 2003

940 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5efa4cb652cb7dc65bb4f94f24d3d21b30a9841

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Barbara L. Fredrickson
2. Michael A. Cohn
3. Joseph A. Mikels
4. Stephanie L. Brown
5. A. Conway
6. Andreas Elpidorou
7. R. Veenhoven
8. Wilmar B. Schaufeli

In General Health Professions

1. Barbara L. Fredrickson

Citations in the corpus

• Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: A systematic review (2010, background): “However, poor real time compliance with diary completion and recall accuracy may lead to data of questionable validity (Stone et al., 2003).”
• Happiness Unpacked: Positive Emotions Increase Life Satisfaction by Building Resilience (2009, methodology): “Using a computer-validated diary method, we gathered data on day-to-day positive emotions with greater accuracy than is possible with broad retrospective ratings or paper diaries (Stone et al., 2003).”
• Measuring People Intensively (2009, background): “There is some evidence of noncompliance in studies using signal-contingent and time-contingent paper recording procedures (Broderick et al., 2003; Litt, Cooney, & Morse, 1998; Stone et al., 2003).”