The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model

By Klaus R. Scherer. 2009

1,175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f910751bac74490ce48f7f24a0759fbce81cb7c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Reinhard Pekrun
2. Thomas Goetz
3. Sylvia D. Kreibig
4. A. Frenzel
5. Peter Kuppens
6. Agnes Moors
7. E. M. Tong
8. R. Perry

In Social Psychology

1. Reinhard Pekrun
2. Thomas Goetz
3. Klaus R. Scherer
4. A. Frenzel
5. Agnes Moors
6. I. Burić
7. David Sander
8. S. D’Mello

Citations in the corpus

• A mixed-method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: development and validation of the Teacher Emotion Questionnaire (2018, background): “First, emotions can be triggered by a variety of stimuli that need to be appraised as relevant to one’s goals (Scherer, 2009).”
• An Appraisal-Driven Componential Approach to the Emotional Brain (2018, positive): “…agree with the idea that emotions are multicomponential phenomena, and this aspect is particularly essential to the CPM of emotion proposed by Scherer (1984, 2009b), according to whom “The components of an emotion episode are the respective states of the five subsystems and the process…”
• Extending the extended mind: the case for extended affectivity (2015, background): “This approach reflects not only, we think, our common-sense understanding of the emotions, but also a dominant trend in affective science (e.g., Russell 2003; Scherer 2009).”
• An appraisal account of individual differences in emotional experience (2010, methodology): “Appraisal is not a one-off occurrence but is continuously updated as a function of changing events or concerns (Scherer, 2009).”
• Affective Influences on Energy-Related Decisions and Behaviors (2014, background): “After a long time of neglect, however, the last two decades have seen an enormous increase in research on emotion highlighting the importance of emotional processes for a successful functioning of the human mind (Davidson et al., 2003; Sander and Scherer, 2009).”
• Assessing the Ability to Recognize Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion: Construction and Validation of the Emotion Recognition Index (2011, methodology): “A comprehensive description of this test and the details of the construct validation study are provided in an article by Bänziger, Grandjean, and Scherer (2009).”
• Bringing appraisal theory to environmental risk perception: a review of conceptual approaches of the past 40 years and suggestions for future research (2012, methodology): “There is divergence among appraisal theorists about the order of activation of the appraisals (Moors 2009).3 However, most appraisal theorists view emotions as causing action tendencies (Ellsworth and Scherer 2003; Frijda 1986; Scherer 2009b).”
• The Nature and Dynamics of Relevance and Valence Appraisals: Theoretical Advances and Recent Evidence (2013, background): “Flykt, Dan, and Scherer (2009) reported an attempt to estimate the time window of the intrinsic pleasantness check using a dualtask probe paradigm.”
• Scaffoldings of the affective mind (2015, background): “…of our affective states—such as bodily processes (typically, changes in autonomic nervous system activity, expression, and behavior), action readiness (dispositions or tendencies to act in specific ways), cognitive evaluations or “appraisals,” and feelings or phenomenal experiences (Scherer, 2009).”