Sylvia D. Kreibig

Social Psychology · 2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 14 researchers and is trusted by 37 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Sylvia D. Kreibig trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Klaus R. Scherer
  2. Stephen W. Porges
  3. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  4. Theodore P. Beauchaine
  5. G. Gendolla
  6. Margaret M. Bradley
  7. James Russell
  8. R. Levenson
  9. Peter J. Lang
  10. Ira J. Roseman

Who trusts Sylvia D. Kreibig overall

  1. Lauren E. Young
  2. Hugo D. Critchley
  3. David Sander
  4. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
  5. R. Levenson
  6. Philip Schmidt
  7. Mark Schaller
  8. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  9. James J. Gross
  10. Neil A. Harrison

Papers from Sylvia D. Kreibig's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Sylvia D. Kreibig trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Are Emotions Natural Kinds? (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  2. The polyvagal theory: phylogenetic substrates of a social nervous system. (International Journal of Psychophysiology)
  3. The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model
  4. Vagal tone, development, and Gray's motivational theory: Toward an integrated model of autonomic nervous system functioning in psychopathology (Development and Psychopathology)
  5. The amygdala: vigilance and emotion (Molecular Psychiatry)
  6. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body
  7. Autonomic nervous system activity in emotion: a review. (Biological Psychology)
  8. Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  9. An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli. (Behavioral Neuroscience)
  10. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)

Their papers