Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries

By Dianne A. van Hemert, F. Vijver, Y. Poortinga, J. Georgas. 2002

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f83d9a2a5508b1b35a46e3e30db655d1df4e66db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Ronald Fischer
2. F. V. D. van de Vijver
3. Dianne A. van Hemert
4. Y. Poortinga
5. T. Johnson
6. Peter B. Smith
7. S. Shavitt
8. Dirk T. Tempelaar

In Clinical Psychology

1. Ronald Fischer
2. Y. Poortinga
3. Y. Cho
4. T. Johnson
5. F. V. D. van de Vijver
6. S. Shavitt

In Social Psychology

1. Ronald Fischer
2. S. Shavitt
3. Dianne A. van Hemert
4. Y. Poortinga
5. Peter B. Smith
6. F. V. D. van de Vijver
7. H. van Herk
8. T. Johnson

Citations in the corpus

• Emotion and culture: A meta-analysis (2007, methodology): “In earlier research (Van Hemert et al., 2002b, 2002a, 2007) we found GNP to be an important factor in explaining cross-national differences in some aspects of personality and affect.”
• The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles (2005, background): “This is consistent with previous findings reported by van Hemert et al. (2002).2”
• Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias (2004, background): “This is especially important in light of those recent studies showing that mean differences might be due to culturally determined communication patterns rather than bias (Smith, 2004; Van Hemert et al., 2002 ).”
• Response Styles in Rating Scales (2004, result): “…distinc- van Herk et al. / RESPONSE STYLES IN EU COUNTRIES 357 tion have come about, at least in part, through cross-cultural differences in acquiescence, and perhaps other response styles, supporting suggestions made, for example, by Berry et al. (2002) and by Van Hemert et al. (2002).”
• Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style (2004, background): “Watkins and Cheung (1995) found evidence for five types of cultural variations in aspects of response format among high school students in Nigeria, Australia, China, Nepal, and the Philippines, namely, positivity bias, negativity bias, low standard deviation, inconsistency of related items, and cons”