The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality

By Katherine Calvin, B. Bond‐Lamberty, Leon Clarke, J. Edmonds, Jiyong Eom, C. Hartin, Son H Kim, Page Kyle, R. Link, R. Moss and 5 more. 2017

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7d075a83d89e7e641c2e3a67ec97427867d8f74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Gunnar Luderer
2. D. V. van Vuuren
3. Keywan Riahi
4. D. P. Vuuren
5. Elmar Kriegler
6. Volker Krey
7. Bas J. van Ruijven
8. Shinichiro Fujimori

In Global and Planetary Change

1. D. P. Vuuren
2. D. V. van Vuuren
3. H. Meijl
4. Brian C. O'Neill
5. Keywan Riahi
6. Bas J. van Ruijven
7. Elmar Kriegler
8. Shinichiro Fujimori

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Brian C. O'Neill
2. Elmar Kriegler
3. D. P. Vuuren
4. Keywan Riahi
5. Bastien Girod
6. Massimo Tavoni
7. S. K.C.

Citations in the corpus

• The Shared Socio-economic Pathways : Trajectories for human development and global environmental change (2017, methodology): “Five individual papers describe the main dynamics of each SSP scenario (Calvin et al., 2017; Fricko et al., 2017; Fujimori et al., 2017; Kriegler et al., 2017; van Vuuren et al., 2017).”
• Global surface air temperatures in CMIP6: historical performance and future changes (2020, neutral): “The SSPs are based on five narratives describing alternative pathways for socioeconomic development, including sustainable development (SSP1) (van Vuuren et al 2017), middle-of-the-road development (SSP2) (Fricko et al 2017), regional rivalry (SSP3) (Fujimori et al 2017), inequality (SSP4) (Calvin e”
• Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (2017, background): “Identifier Descriptor Marker IAM Also computed by (non-marker IAMs) Central SPA assumptions for Climate Mitigation SSP1 Sustainability IMAGE (van Vuuren et al., 2017) All Early accession with global collaboration as of 2020 SSP2 Middle-of-theroad MESSAGEGLOBIOM (Fricko et al., 2017) All Some delays ”
• Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm (2017, result): “In several figures, we compare the IMAGE results with the range of outcomes by the implementation of the other IAMs, i.e. AIM (Fujimori et al., 2017), GCAM (Calvin et al., 2017), MESSAGEGLOBIOM (Fricko et al., 2017), REMIND-MagPIE (Kriegler et al., 2017), and WITCH (Emmerling et al., 2016).”
• Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century (2018, background): “SSP4-3.”
• Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century (2017, neutral): “Afforestation occurs in the SSP5 mitigation scenarios by GCAM and AIM/CGE (only SSP5-26), but is not accessible as mitigation option in the REMIND-MAgPIE implementation of the SSPs.”
• Analysing interactions among Sustainable Development Goals with Integrated Assessment Models (2019, methodology): “The models included here are AIM-CGE [33], China TIMES [34], DNE21þ [35], GCAM [36], GEM-E3 [37], IMAGE [38], IPAC [39], PRIMES [37], REMIND-MAgPIE [40], MESSAGEBrazil [41], MESSAGE-GLOBIOM [42], and WITCH [43].”