When the “Honeymoon” Is Over: A Case Study of a Coach-Athlete Dyad in Crisis

By S. Jowett. 2003

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f799e7f5cdeda37989bd61a62bf28104f176e6b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Receiving video-based feedback in elite ice-hockey: a player's perspective (2014, background): “…in the coaching literature that has suggested that ‘respect’ is one of the core factors influencing the nature of coach athlete relationships and the subsequent pedagogical interactions that occur between them (e.g. Poczwardowski et al., 2002; Potrac et al., 2002; Jowett, 2003; Purdy et al., 2008).”
Coaching Life Skills through Football: A Study of Award Winning High School Coaches (2007, background): “However, a recent series of studies by Jowett and her colleagues (Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Ntoumanis, 2004; Jowett & Timson-Katchis, 2005) has begun to shed light on the nature of the coach-athlete relationship.”
Positive Coaching: Ethical Practices for Athlete Development (2011, background): “Doing this, we believe, could extend the work of such coaching scholars as Jowett and colleagues (e.g., Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Meek, 2000; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003), who examined coaches’ and athletes’ interactions, beyond being an interpersonal relationship, to show how power, as expressed through…”
A qualitative investigation of the motivational climate in elite sport (2014, result): “After extensive discussion and reflection, these were labelled ‘closeness’, ‘commitmentededication’ and ‘complementarity’, respectively, in order to reflect similarities with existing models (Jowett, 2003).”
Parents’ Reflections on their Child's Experiences of Emotionally Abusive Coaching Practices (2012, background): “Conversely, negative relational issues such as conflict within the coachathlete dyad reportedly had unpleasant ramifications for athlete development (Greenleaf et al., 2001; Jowett, 2003).”
The perceived effects of elite athletes' experiences of emotional abuse in the coach–athlete relationship (2013, background): “Previous research has reported that the quality of the coach–athlete relationship is a crucial determinant of athlete satisfaction and motivation (Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003; Jowett & Meek, 2000; Mageau & Vallerand, 2003).”
Expanding the Interpersonal Dimension: Closeness in the Coach-Athlete Relationship (2007, methodology): “More recently in sport psychology, Jowett and colleagues [30, 36-40] have investigated the construct of closeness in sports contexts using the 3+1Cs model—comprised of Closeness (affective-feelings of liking, trust, respect), Commitment (cognitive-intention to maintain relationship), Complementarity”
When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport (2013, background): “…to successful relationships (Jowett & Cockerill, 2003), but it could also be interpreted as dominance and as a lack of respect, which could be detrimental to a healthy relationship (Blanchard, Amiot, Perreault, Vallerand, & Provencher, 2009; Burke, 2001; Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003).”
Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors (2011, background): “On the other hand, mistrust, dominance, and lack of respect were found to be factors that hinder coaches’ and athletes’ effectiveness and well-being (e.g., Blanchard, Amiot, Perreault, Vallerand, & Provencher, 2009; Burke, 2001; Jowett, 2003).”
Empathic accuracy in coach–athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports (2009, background): “…context has been demonstrated in a series of qualitative studies that have been conducted recently using the integrated conceptual model of closeness, commitment, complementarity , and co-orientation (e.g., Jowett, 2003; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003; Jowett & Frost, 2007; Jowett & Meek, 2000).”