Research on Assessment of Life Satisfaction of Children and Adolescents

By E. Scott Huebner. 2004

636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f78fdd7d1ce6aaea78a9064cf004546ce215b822

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Redefining Disability, Re-imagining the Self: Disability Identification Predicts Self-esteem and Strategic Responses to Stigma (2013, background): “The effort to understand how people establish and maintain psychological well-being given the physical, social and emotional challenges of human life is a core topic cutting across many subdisciplines of behavioral science and mental health practice (e.g., Diener, Ng, Harter, & Arora, 2010; Huebner,”
Neighborhood Effects on the Long-Term Well-Being of Low-Income Adults (2012, neutral): “Another reason we focus on adults is because more is known about measuring SWB of adults than youth (19).”
Please May I Have a Bike? Better Yet, May I Have a Hug? An Examination of Children’s and Adolescents’ Happiness (2009, background): “Nowhere is work on children’s life satisfaction more in evidence than in studies conducted by Huebner and his colleagues (e.g., Ash and Huebner 1998; Huebner 2004; Huebner and Dew 1996; Huebner et al. 2004, 2005, 2007).”
Resilience and perceived stress: predictors of life satisfaction in the students of success and failure (2010, background): “In particular, life satisfaction has been found to be positively related to key indicators of adaptive functioning including, self esteem (Dew & Huebner, 1994), positive parent–child and interpersonal relations (Huebner, 2004), and academic ability and adjustment (Leung & Leung, 1992).”
Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences (2008, background): “unemployed) and school resources (Diener et al., 2005; Huebner, 2004).”
“Building Hope for the Future”: A Program to Foster Strengths in Middle-School Students (2011, methodology): “…improve goal-directed thinking (Cheavens et al. 2006; Curry et al. 1999; Klausner et al. 1998, 2000; Lopez et al. 2000a; MacLeod et al. 2007), this study includes a broad-scale hope intervention through the collaboration of key stakeholders (Huebner 2004) such as parents, teachers and school peers.”
Relationships among school climate domains and school satisfaction (2011, methodology): “Although many conceptualizations of positive well-being have been promoted, the construct of life satisfaction or perceived quality of life (PQOL) in schools has frequently been used as an overarching indicator of student well-being (Huebner, 2004).”
Youth life satisfaction measures: a review (2009, methodology): “Life satisfaction measures are typically derived from three conceptual models or frameworks: unidimensional (i.e., global and general LS) and multidimensional (Huebner, 2004).”
Investigating Validity Evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Adapted for Children (2010, background): “Huebner 2004; Gilman and Huebner 2003 for reviews).”
The Role of Positive Psychology Constructs in Predicting Mental Health and Academic Achievement in Children and Adolescents: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study (2011, background): “adolescent investigates positive characteristics such as hope, self-efficacy, flow, selfesteem, optimism, courage, gratitude, and the promotion of positive development (e.g., Huebner 2004; Rich 2003).”
Does the Importance of Parent and Peer Relationships for Adolescents’ Life Satisfaction Vary Across Cultures? (2011, background): “However, only a few studies have investigated the predictive power of early adolescents' life satisfaction for later development (Huebner, 2004).”
Predictive and Incremental Validity of Global and Domain-Based Adolescent Life Satisfaction Reports (2007, background): “Although early work focused on the development of measures for adults, recent work has been aimed at the assessment of children and youth (Gilman & Huebner, 2000; Huebner, 2004).”