Investigating Validity Evidence of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Adapted for Children

By A. Gadermann, K. Schonert-Reichl, Bruno D. Zumbo. 2010

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3eeeacc10264aba09d1fc1ae485e637255a63190

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Margaret L. Kern
2. M. Guhn
3. M. White
4. A. Gadermann
5. Bruno D. Zumbo
6. A. Adler
7. L. Waters
8. M. Thielking

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. M. Guhn
2. A. Gadermann
3. Bruno D. Zumbo
4. Margaret L. Kern
5. A. Adler
6. L. Waters
7. M. White
8. Sarah Mercer

In Social Psychology

1. L. Waters
2. Margaret L. Kern
3. M. Guhn
4. M. White
5. A. Gadermann
6. Bruno D. Zumbo
7. A. Adler
8. Sarah Mercer

Citations in the corpus

• A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework (2014, methodology): “Reliabilities in our sample were consistent with the Gadermann et al. study (α = .86), but this limitation should be kept in mind when considering variable relations. 4. Before conducting our analyses, we verified the factorability of the items with the development set, which was supported by both t”
• Investigating the Substantive Aspect of Construct Validity for the Satisfaction with Life Scale Adapted for Children: A Focus on Cognitive Processes (2011, methodology): “In a previous study, the SWLS-C showed favourable psychometric properties in terms of reliability, factor structure, differential item and scale functioning, and correlations to convergent and discriminant measures ( Gadermann et al. 2010 ).”